Let's be clear before we go any further, I'm not talking in the slightest about the people (although, yes, the denizens are, on a case-to-case basis, quite attractive). And I'm not talking about the landscape (although, again, with mountains, rolling hills, lush forests and shoreline, we've got a pretty beautiful place [which sounds redundant, but isn't]). I'm not even talking about the wide array flora and fauna (okay, I just wanted to use that expression, because it makes me feel very David Attenborough).
I'm talking about borders. Yes, borders. Virginia is a very well-shaped state. When looked upon with any map that outlines man-made state lines, Virginia is, geographically, very good looking. It's got peaks, dips, straight lines, jagged lines. It's really got a little of everything.
Come on a features tour with me, won't you (Please see image below to reinforce the tour)? At first glance, the Commonwealth looks a bit like a scalene triangle. Beginning at the southern side, Virginia has a rather a planed southern border. The straight x-axis tilts slightly, causing the state to look ready and poised for movement. Coming up the western side, the tip jut
s up, like a shark's fin, before plunging down and then back up in a steep, sail-like rise. Another jut before the descending lines of the northern tip make way for the drop, slide and finger-like peninsulas of the inner Chesapeake shoreline. The Eastern Shore peninsula, while perhaps awkward in its separation from the rest of the state (see Michigan, which would be a very good looking state, were it not for that silly western monstrosity), provides a nice weight to balance the expansive western span. All together, Virginia looks not unlike a sleek, maritime vessel sailing triumphantly from battle (although admittedly, it also looks a bit like a duck that's fallen flat on its face). The borders weren't always this (I dare say) sexy. Virginia has a long history of shifting its lines. In the early colonial periods, the name "Virginia" applies to basically he entire East Coast down to South Carolina and north and west up into inland Canada. From their, the state was sculpted down to its current trim and tone self through agreements, treaties and general demands from what would turn out to be less good looking states and provinces (let's be honest, aside from Quebec, Canada doesn't have a lot going for it in terms of good looking dividing lines).
Lest you call me a xenophobe, there are a number of states I find attractive (and a number I find unattractive).
Top attractive state lines:
- Virginia (of course)
- Texas
- Illinois
- Michigan (minus the western monstrosity)
- Hawaii
- Florida
- New Jersey
- Montana (business in front, party in back)
- Louisiana (like a foot with algae growing off it)
- Idaho
Least attractive state lines:
- Wyoming & Colorado (tie for fugliness)
- All the other square-like ones
- Minnesota (it's like a strange, lanky, tall person)
- Oklahoma (what is that sticky-outty thing?)
- Maryland (it's so close to being attractive, but instead looks like it's had bites taken out from surrounding states)
Liam and I were actually having a similar conversation while he was studying for the geography bee. He really likes Florida because it's shaped like a gun and Nebraska because it kind of looks like a canon. For the most part, I agree with your list. However, I have always liked the shape of California. And since Virginia is your number one, doesn't West Virginia kind of look like some sort of parasite attached to it? Very funny post!
ReplyDeleteYou're forgetting one wonderful one: California! Actually two, Washington's pretty good looking in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteBut that's my West Coast roots talking.
I like the Michigan reference. Although, I would definitely put it as number one. Mittens are just such a nice shape.
ReplyDeleteEXCUSE ME.
ReplyDeleteHow could you forget Ohio, the heart of it all? No love from Mr. Virginia.